|
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Donate | Members | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Information
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
Epona's Tender
![]()
|
I've been informed by many sources about the evasion clause, evasion items aren't aloud either, such as bright powder, lax incense because they also lower the foes accuracy...
Just a thought from a fresh wifi trainer, Seph
__________________
If me and Yu-Gi dueled against eachother, I would win. I'd just mention 'Rule Book' and he'd lose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) |
|
Define my Style
![]()
|
My understanding of that is, those items tend to fall under the hax item clause.
__________________
![]() [I Punch Dance Out My Rage]|[Pokémon League]|[The Battle Tent - Dare You Enter] ![]() ^_^ Shuan Platinum FC: 0603 3379 9148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
dan is on omg
![]()
|
self ko clause does that mean u cant use explosion or nothing like tat at ne point in the game for ex. Bronzong first pokemon out and opponent mew first pokemon out. not last bronzong explosion. Both players switch to another pokemon. Does that go against the Clause.
__________________
![]() 360989274168-brawl FC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
remembering the fallen
![]()
|
If the battle has gone well for both (or badly depending on perspective I suppose) and you have attacked and countered down to 1 pokemon each and your pokemon can use a self KO move, use of that move would result in a loss Using a self KO move to get rid of a tricky pokemon or if yours is going down anyway is a legitimate tactic just not in a 1 v 1 situation Not sure I explained that very well but the situation is really hard to get down
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|